Invite:
Catalogue:
Poster design:
Gifs:
Room Plan:
Overall, as a group we all collaborated together and worked at a productive pace in order to get tasks done as a team. We all successfully had allocated roles but set design rules and concepts so that the final outcome designs fitted each other and followed the same aesthetic. As a group we were also successful at communicating with one another to discuss ideas and concepts which enabled our final outcomes to link together.
When receiving feedback from peers, it was decided that the branding of our exhibition could have been stripped back by using the concept of our exhibition more rather than the bit mapped images. Other feedback given was that not all of our final outcomes were coherent, therefore more consideration into the designs should have took place. This could have been executed by more than one person doing each individual task so ideas were able to be discussed further.
When relating to my design input (making the invites) feedback stated that stronger card should have been used for the envelopes of the designs. This would have made the designs seems more polished and professional, especially due to them going to industry professionals. However, peers liked the individuality of the laser cut logo for the envelops of our designs as did our group.
When relating back to the planning of our exhibition our ideas were too costly and complicated for such a low budget exhibition. Some of our design choices were also unrealistic such as the netting for hanging the flags off. This is because it would nit have stayed stable causing part of the exhibition to collapse.
No comments:
Post a Comment